On Mon, 2025-01-06 at 17:49 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 10:05 AM Mattia Verga via devel > <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Despite 0.16 being available as tag in repository since 2015, > > libnova > > was never updated and it's still 0.15 in Fedora. > > > > I have notified the package maintainer long ago [1], but I never > > got a > > reply. So I plan to push an update as provenpackager, which will > > include > > a soname bump (from libnova-0.15.so.0 to libnova-0.16.so.0) and > > rebuild > > all dependent packages in a side-tag for Rawhide. The list of > > affected > > packages is: > > Please don't use provenpackager privileges for this kind of thing. > If the maintainer is truly unresponsive, that's what the unresponsive > maintainer process is for. > You can even commit rights on the package within a week or two, if > some conditions are met. I have the same problem with lxc and lxcfs all maintainers are more or less unresponsive , I did the PR, I waited, I asked and finally I used PP power to merge it and built it [1] . My point here is while we have maintainers that maintain the package and don't like that proven packagers change it, we have many others which don't even reply , so is not easy decide what to do . [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lxcfs/pull-request/1 merged by me https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lxcfs/pull-request/2 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lxc/pull-request/3 -- Sérgio M. B. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
