On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 12:20 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz <lukasz.wojnilowicz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 25-01-08 12:07, Neal Gompa wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 12:04 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz > ><lukasz.wojnilowicz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On 25-01-08 09:08, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> >On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 6:10 AM David Sommerseth via devel > >> ><devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On 08/01/2025 11:04, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> >> > On 08. 01. 25 10:27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:01:33AM -0000, Hong Xu wrote: > >> >> >>> This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive > >> >> >>> maintainer page: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/#stesp > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> If anyone knows how to contact ngompa, please let me know. The pull > >> >> >>> request has been unreviewed for more than 2 weeks: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wob/pull-request/1 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Considering this PR is opened just a few days before the Christmas, a period > >> >> >> when many people are not working (or significantly reduced work) for several > >> >> >> weeks, IMHO 2 weeks is not sufficient time to wait before going for the > >> >> >> non-responsive maintainer process. A simple comment on the PR requesting > >> >> >> a response is probably a better first step. > >> >> > Except it rarely works with Neal unless you ping him via a side channel :( > >> >> > >> >> I've pinged him on his Mastodon account. > >> >> > >> > > >> >Well, this is a first. 😅 > >> > > >> >I had been intentionally away during the Christmas holidays, but also > >> >wound up getting pretty deeply sick. > >> > > >> >But yes, direct email or Matrix message works pretty effectively. > >> >Bugzilla mail is something I check periodically, not asynchronously. > >> > >> Your review request at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318522 must have been lost then. > > > >Yeah, though I do get notified specially when someone sets themselves > >as a reviewer, which hasn't happened in that bug. > > I don't understand. I set myself as the Assignee of this bug, and set > the status to ASSIGNED. > > You mean that "fedora-review" set to "?" is for setting oneself as a reviewer? Yep, that. It's also required when approving a review to set it to "+". -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
