> All the necessary user/group provides should already be in place since > F40 mass rebuild, and it shouldn't matter which mechanism actually > creates the users, so it's not committing to any changes in user/group > handling as such, this is just an extra packaging hygiene step in the > process. Given above, I think that the proposal should be uncontroversial as it is mostly about cleanup and finishing touches because the feature as such is already present in rpm. Let me know what you guys think. Cheers, Michal -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
