Re: Revocation of provenpackager access from pbrobinson

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 9:26 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
<devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 18/12/2024 22:59, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> > What I'd like to see is to remove provenpackagers, do everything through
> > PRs and have a separate SIG/group that can fast-track and merge any PR.
>
> Not an option because when we update some important libraries, we need
> to rebuild more than 50 packages. If we have to use pull requests and
> wait for them to be merged, it will take forever to push updated
> versions of these libraries.

I know it is tempting to speculate given the lack of concrete
information, but this is just silly.
I think it's fair to say that all 9 fesco members agree that simple
bump-and-rebuilds are not a violation of the PP policy.

Fabio
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux