On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 09:26:37AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 18/12/2024 22:59, Simon de Vlieger wrote: > > What I'd like to see is to remove provenpackagers, do everything through > > PRs and have a separate SIG/group that can fast-track and merge any PR. > > Not an option because when we update some important libraries, we need to > rebuild more than 50 packages. If we have to use pull requests and wait for > them to be merged, it will take forever to push updated versions of these > libraries. For these situations IMHO it would be better if we did not need to have provenpackagers trigger the rebuilds. We should have a fully automatable way for *any* package to trigger a rebuild of dependent things. If the person does not need to make any changes to the spec, directly, only through an automated tool, there would be no need for the elevated provenpackagers privilege and it would also avoid any risk of complaints of unrelated changes being made at the same time. In the context of such rebuilds, provenpackagers is simply a workaround for our insufficient automation. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
