* Adam Williamson: > Fedora is open by default. Everything is supposed to happen in the open > unless there is a specific reason for it to be done otherwise. This is > why we have ticket trackers for everything, public meetings, public > chat rooms, public forums, public package repos, a public build > system... > > It's a bit hard to find this written down anywhere, but at least to me > it's been a part of the Fedora DNA forever. The Fedora mission does say > "We do all of this as a transparent, collaborative community of > Friends". I think Fedora mailing list moderation traditionally did not follow this, and with good reason. I do prefer transparency, but their are limits. For the provenpackage scenario, it may be better to document publicly that action has been taken, without naming the individual, and leaving it to them to disclose that they were the impacted party. After all, it's not great to have a permanent record of an alleged wrongdoing in various mailing list archives around the world. In some cases, if two individuals just can't get along and it begins to harm the project, it may become necessary to ask at least one of them to leave, at least temporarily, and may not even be clearcut who the guilty party is (not saying this was the case here). Thanks, Florian -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
