Re: Revocation of provenpackager access from pbrobinson

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16 Dec 2024 08:08, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 at 20:33, Josh Stone <jistone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Tuesday (2024-12-10), the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee
> > (FESCo) met in a private meeting to discuss whether Fedora contributor
> > Peter Robinson should retain his provenpackager privileges. Over the
> > last year, multiple private tickets have been opened with FESCo
> > regarding Peter’s packaging behavior. In particular, on numerous
> > occasions Peter has pushed uncommunicated updates to packages he has no
> > prior relationship with, interfering with those packages’ maintenance
> > efforts. On at least a few occasions, this has resulted in other
> > maintainers being forced to react to these changes with no coordination
> > or notice.
> >
> 
> I know that these sorts of matters are hard to deal with, but this entire
> thing comes across more as something from the mythological Star Chamber
> than something I would expect from Fedora.

Absolutely agreed.  I find this sort of behavior by FESCo unacceptable.

> Yes, Peter is hard to get along with at times, and yes he can be brusque,
> pushy, and grumpier than any mule or cow I have had the 'pleasure' to work
> with, and I have been at the tail end of his tongue multiple times over the
> years in Fedora. Yet in all those years, I have also known that his work
> has been in service of the parts of the project he has been given charge
> of, be it architecture or package sets. Of the many people I have seen
> problems with 'proven packager' he has been the least likely I would
> consider 'dropped from Proven Packager'.

I have worked with Peter for years; I consider him a friend, so my
opinion is biased.  Having worked with software/hardware developers
for several decades, I find him no more rough around the edges than
most anyone in the industry :).  Regardless, one does not become PP
without some demonstration of Doing The Right Thing for Fedora, and
that has always, always, always, been my experience in working with
Peter -- not only in Fedora, but at Linaro, and at Red Hat.

There are some who are very possessive of their packages.  I wrestle
with that myself.  However, in over a decade as a packager, I have
never seen an update to dist-git that wasn't needed, and apart from
the broadcast announcements, have never gotten advance warning.  More
importantly, I appreciate the changes -- this is volunteer work and
every little bit helps.  I have learnt to "get over myself", put my
ego aside, and that I don't have to control everything.  I honestly
wish more packagers could see these things as what they are -- 
attempts to help, not some infringement on their personal territory.

> In the future, I would hope that these matters are dealt with in a public
> setting or make sure that items are published before you announce
> judgement. There have been a lot of things in the past that tested my
> temper in Fedora, but this is the first thing that has truly broken my
> trust.

Also agreed 100%.  A litany of these sorts of things is why I am
a Debian Developer Emeritus -- I lost my patience with it all and
finally left after 20+ years as a DD.  This is the first time I have
been seriously disappointed in Fedora.

I would argue that unless this discussion can be open and transparent,
Peter's PP status should be immediately reinstated.  I would further
argue that such decisions should be community decisions, perhaps via a
secret ballot, rather than a FESCo decision.

-- 
Ciao,
al
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Al Stone 
E-mail: ahs3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
----------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux