SPDX Statistics - 268 packages remaining

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hot news:

- I walked through all firmware packages. And they have either PR waiting to be merged or issue created as fedora-license-data repository.

- I walked throught our Packaging Guidelines and everywhere where was used Callaway license, I corrected it to SPDX _expression_. It was usually examples and the license tag was just minor thing. If you see any documentation that still use legacy _expression_, I will be grateful if you could convert it to SPDX.

- There were several updates in Legal Documentation. Notably guidelines about trademarks and practical examples of what to put in License tag.

Two weeks ago we had:

* 24340 spec files in Fedora

* 30993 license tags in all spec files

* 305 tags are not SPDX compliant (number from line bellow minus packages with LicenseRef-Callaway-*)

* 2587 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 56 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`

* Progress: 99.02% ░░░░░ 100%

ELN subset:

62 out of 2313 packages are not converted yet (progress 97.32%)


Today we have:

* 24366 spec files in Fedora

* 31018 license tags in all spec files

* 268 tags are not SPDX compliant (number from line bellow minus packages with LicenseRef-Callaway-*)

* 2542 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 29 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`

* Progress: 99.14% ░░░░░ 100%

ELN subset:

67 out of 2335 packages are not converted yet (progress 97.13%)

Graph of these data with the burndown chart:

   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?usp=sharing

The list of packages needed to be converted is here:

    https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt

List by package maintainers is here

   https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt

Packages that are neither in SPDX nor in Callaway format (highest priority for now) - 59 packages:

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/neither-nor-remaining-packagers.txt

Most of such packages has open issue in fedora-license-data. A lot of them are waiting for SPDX to approved the license and assign ID.


I did NOT released new fedora-license-data as there were added only two public domain dedication and one firmware license.

    13 licenses are waiting to be reviewed by SPDX.org (and then to be added to fedora-license-data) https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/?label_name%5B%5D=SPDX%3A%3Ablocked


If your package does not have neither git-log entry nor spec-changelog entry mentioning SPDX and you know your license tag matches SPDX formula, you can put your package on ignore list

  https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt

Either pull-request or direct email to me is fine.

Miroslav



-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux