On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 4:35 AM František Lachman <flachman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > Regarding the Packit role in situations like this, I hope it does not matter much if it's used. Packit user is not even listed as a maintainer of packages since it does not require any extra permissions. And most importantly, Packit does not work without human interaction (in the form of PR review and merging) which is a positive thing I think. No change will get to dist-git automatically and just a set of Packit-created new-release pull-requests gets updated when there is a new version. Is this activity misleading to the orphaning scripts? Should the scripts be updated or something changed on the Packit side so as not to cause false expectations that the package is being actively maintained? > I'm not sure how we can improve this. At least this package doesn't seem to be using the feature to auto-merge and auto-build like some of the others do. Those are the features that create this problem. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
