Re: pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> * We do expect smartcards to work on immutable systems where
> installing extra packages is either inconvenient (Silverblue and
> Kinoite require overlays) or not possible (future Fedoras, hopefully)

Quite a distopian future you paint there!

My vision of the future does NOT include an Android-like distribution where 
the core system is off limits and applications can only be run in 
restrictive sandboxes. (Not only do I not want that on my desktop or 
notebook, I do not even want that on my smartphone, which is why I am 
running a package-based distribution on my PinePhone!)

As for this particular update, IMHO, anything breaking eduroam is completely 
unacceptable in an update for a stable release and should never have made it 
through testing. It should be reverted immediately.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux