Re: protobuf: too old and too new, how to move forward?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22. 11. 24 17:14, Paul Wouters wrote:

Hi,

There seems to be an issue that is stalled with respect to the protobuf
version packaged in fedora:

See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/28

Updating it breaks stuff, but keeping it at the current old version also
breaks stuff.

One solution is to create two versions, as offered in the PR above, but
this has not seen any action yet.

I'm in the camp of needing a newer protobuf in rawhide/F41 due to other
packages needing the newer version. (so in a way, I am happy to break
the old stuff over breaking the new stuff as is the case now).

It would be good to have a discussion here followed by a plan to resolve
this issue. If that means doing two protobuf versions, I'm willing to
help with that as well.
Yes, having multiple packages with different versions is usually the way to go.

See e.g. python-pytest7.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Fedora Matrix: mhroncok

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux