Re: pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi,

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:09 AM Clemens Lang <cllang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On 19. Nov 2024, at 17:47, Arthur Bols <arthur@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > A few days ago pkcs11-provider-0.5-3.fc41 update was pushed to Fedora 41. Unfortunately, this update breaks eduroam and possibly many other WPA2-Enterprise wifi networks. There are multiple threads on Fedora Discussion, mainly [0], and a bug report [1].
> >
> > I understand that the maintainers implemented this change with the best intentions, however, could someone clarify why this provider was enabled so abruptly in this update? Wouldn’t such a change typically require a change proposal? Given how many users are affected, would it make sense to consider rolling back the update until there’s a fix?
>
> I think the bug can be fixed in wpa_supplicant, but until that happens, users should just uninstall pkcs11-provider.
>
> The idea here was to auto-enable pkcs11-provider when it is installed, which still makes sense to me. The issue here I think is that many people ended up with pkcs11-provider installed because of a recommendation. We should remove that recommendation, most users don’t need pcks11-provider installed.

I'm trying a setup right now, to understand what's happening.
wpa_supplicant does not need pkcs11-provider *at the moment*, because
it uses engine API for pkcs11 (and that is going to be a problem in
the future for EAP-TLS with pkcs11, if engine disappears from
openssl). However, it loads the legacy provider at startup, because
it's needed for MSCHAPv2 in the inner authentication.

-- 
davide

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux