Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > When was this decided? I only remember FESCo ever having decided to > require +2 for critpath updates, not for non-critpath ones. > > At some point, those values were written down in the documentation, but > under what authority? Where was the FESCo decision for that? PS: I suspect the documentation was actually just an attempt to document the previous broken Bodhi policy implementation. (See https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/772 and https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/1033 – both got closed, but the issue was never properly fixed.) So now instead of resolving the inconsistency to the more liberal policy (requiring only +1 for both manual and automatic pushes), AFAIK matching what FESCo actually decided, and either way having the lowest practical impact (because it would not have allowed anything that was not previously allowed), it was instead decided to resolve it the strict way (requiring +2 in both cases), making policy with no FESCo decision. All that because of documentation that was faulty because it was matching a Bodhi bug. Please fix both Bodhi and the documentation to match what was actually decided by FESCo, or point us to the FESCo decision that proves that the current code and documentation does that (because I believe it does not). Kevin Kofler -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
