On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 02:20:32PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 04:23:16AM -0600, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > Can we please look into getting pesign rebuilt? Ideally in f41, but > > at the very least in f42. > > I bumped the release and did a rawhide build: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125797324 > > If that all looks ok and it's needed, can do f41 too. Having the changes in f41 too would be ideal, as that would allow us to move forward right away on the riscv64 side. The changes from the version currently in f41 are completely trivial, literally just adding riscv64 to ExclusiveArch, so I'm confident that they're not going to introduce any issue that would not have been already produced by a no-source-change rebuild. That said, I understand that pesign is a particularly vital package, which is probably why it seem to have been excluded from the past several mass rebuilds. Being extra careful is probably advisable. So I leave the decision up to people more familiar with the package and process than I am. Nicolas, perhaps you could weigh in? -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
