Re: ABI change in ImageMagick

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:19:38 +0100
Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, 11:03 Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.40 comes with an ABI change
> >
> > it drops libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.0)(64bit)
> > and has libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.2)(64bit) instead.
> > This sounds wrong ...
> >
> 
> Indeed it does. I've also gotten at least one FTI issue filed due to this
> change already.
> 
> I've -1 karma'd the corresponding f41 update, but it's a Packit managed
> package so I'm quite sure bodhi comments just go into the big /dev/null.

isn't there a policy that requires packages built by bots to pass all
the CI in bodhi? It would not caught this particular issue, but
still ... Although there could be an ABI check in the CI too.


		Dan
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux