Hi, iI have released a new version of the mediaplayer guayadeque [1] and migrated the license to SPDX. However, I am not sure if this is correct. Can someone with experience have a look at the spec file ? [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/guayadeque/blob/rawhide/f/guayadeque.spec Regards Martin
Technically it is correct:
$ license-validate -v 'GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-3-Clause AND
LGPL-2.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.0-or-later WITH
WxWindows-exception-3.1'
Approved
license
You correctly ignored MD5
part because of
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/misc/#_licensing_of_rsa_implementations_of_md5
But not sure where you got: LGPL-2.0-or-later
AND LGPL-2.0-or-later WITH WxWindows-exception-3.1
It is mentioned in defconfig/guayadeque.appdata.xml but not
anywhere else. And no file mantion that in header.
You may want to open upstream issue to discuss this.
On the other hand, in the same file is license of that metadata CC0-1.0 that should be mentioned in license tag.
BTW here is full scan using scancode that is much better than licensecheck: https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spdx-reports/guayadeque.html
I got it using:
scancode
--license --license-references --html /tmp/scan.html -n8 .
-- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
