Removal of long-standing FTBFS packages?

[Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Is this policy applied? Checking rubygem-hashie [1, 2], the answer is 
likely 'No' or there is something broken. But the policy page [3] also 
does not list recent tracking bugs, so the former is likely the case.

Can we reinstate it again?


Vít



[1]: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&classification=Fedora&component=rubygem-hashie&list_id=13525392&product=Fedora&product=Fedora%20EPEL

[2]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16659

[3]: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_tracking_bugs

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue