Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:52:18AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I posted this discussion on Fedora Discussion[1] last week, but I'd
> like to forward this discussion to devel-list for wider consideration.
> For the sake of keeping the conversation in one place, I do ask that
> you reply on the Discussion thread, rather than on Fedora Devel,
> please.
> 
> """
> The number “42” is a significant part of the story of the Hitchhiker’s
> Guide to the Galaxy, a classic series of satirical science fiction
> written by Douglas Adams. It has a long and enduring history in the
> geek lexicon, and it seems to me like the Fedora Project would be
> missing a tremendous opportunity to have a little fun with it.
> 
> I’d like to propose that we consider bringing back the old Fedora
> codenames just this once and declare the release “Fedora 42 (Adams)”,
> ideally with a few subtle nods snuck in to the artwork for the
> release.
> 
> When discussing this on the Fedora Council Matrix channel, Aleksandra
> Fedorova also made the excellent suggestion of producing some “Fedora
> Linux 42”-branded hand towels (which is another nod to the
> Hitchhiker’s series).
> """

Yes, could be a nice "one off" special.

For context, I was trying to remind myself of the various reasons
why we stopped doing release names originally. Sadly a lot of
Fedora's historical record appears to be lost from moving and/or
discontinuing services :-(

The best I found was:

  https://web.archive.org/web/20140402023558/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2013-October/012209.html

which links to "meeting minutes" documented in

 https://fedorahosted.org/board/ticket/146

which no longer exists, and doesn't seem to have been archived
either [1].

The requirement to get legal vetting was the main issue mentioned
in the mailing post, and I do recall that was the big resource
drain in the old process.

We would need to get legal clearance to use "Adams" I presume.

At least if we're doing this as a pre-determined choice
in one-off exercise, we're not going to be wasting Legal
resources as we did when we had them vetting 5+ different
names every 6 months.

With regards,
Daniel

[1] at least if it was archived, it is well hidden from me :-)
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux