On 10/30/24 10:22, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 10/29/24 22:32, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 10/27/24 20:17, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm trying to build netcdf in EPEL10 but the test suite is failing to
run with:
/builddir/build/BUILD/netcdf-c-4.9.2/build/ncgen3/.libs/lt-ncgen3:
error while loading shared libraries: libnetcdf.so.19: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
Comparing EPEL10 to rawhide builds I notice that while the EPEL10
build produces an "lt-ncgen3" binary, rawhide does not. The rawhide
ncgen3 wrapper script appears to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, the EPEL10 one
does not and instead seems to try to produce a "relinked" file.
I don't think I have every run into this issue before and have no
idea why it's happening.
Any libtool experts out there with an idea?
Some more differences:
--- fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/netcdf-4.9.2-
build/ netcdf-c-4.9.2/build/libtool 2024-10-29 20:40:32.996721304
-0600
+++ centos-stream+epel-10-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/netcdf-
c-4.9.2/build/libtool 2024-10-29 20:35:41.753975205 -0600
# Whether or not to optimize for fast installation.
-fast_install=needless
+fast_install=yes
# Is shlibpath searched before the hard-coded library search path?
-shlibpath_overrides_runpath=yes
+shlibpath_overrides_runpath=no
From https://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/libtool.html
Variable: shlibpath_overrides_runpath
Indicates whether it is possible to override the hard-coded
library search path of a program with an environment variable. If this
is set to no, libtool may have to create two copies of a program in
the build tree, one to be installed and one to be run in the build
tree only. When each of these copies is created depends on the value
of fast_install. The default value is ‘unknown’, which is equivalent
to ‘no’.
This appears to be the difference that I'm seeing. It also seems to
just be wrong.
There is no (real) difference between the libtool.spec file in rawhide
and 10-stream. I can't find any public build logs though for centos
stream builds.
It's also very strange that this is the first package I've built that
has had this issue.
I've filed https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-65261
The issue appears to be caused by the rpath workaround from here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_removing_rpath
sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g'
libtool
sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool
Removing that from the netcdf package allows the tests to run. Still
need to confirm that rpath does not return without it though.
The reason for this is
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/binutils/blob/rawhide/f/binutils.spec#_56
IOW the lack of -Wl,--enable-new-dtags on RHEL combined with no RPATH
means that you have to take full responsibility for assuring that the
in-tree library is in LD_LIBRARY_PATH yourself.
--
Yaakov Selkowitz
Principal Software Engineer, Emerging RHEL
Red Hat, Inc.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
