Re: New spec incompatibility between rawhide and epel wrt patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Susi,

Susi Lehtola <jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi,
>
>
> it appears rpm has now deprecated the old %patch syntax in rawhide, which means
> that any old-style expressions
>
> %patch0 -p1 -b .overflow
>
> must now be written as
>
> %patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow
>
> Unfortunately, all the epel branches, in turn, do not support the new %patch
> syntax. This means that one either
> - cannot use the same spec file to build in epel or
> - must introduce conditionals and duplicate code in the spec files
>
> %if 0%{?epel} < 10
> %patch0 -p1 -b .overflow
> %else
> %patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow
> %endif
>
> Is there any hope of fixing this issue, or altenatively, a known workaround that
> is compatible in both branches?

The following should work on all rpm versions [1]:
%patch -P1


Cheers,

Dan

Footnotes:
[1]  https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/spec.html#patch-1

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux