On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 09:07:59AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kevin Fenzi: > > > As a side note, I removed s309x from the noarch_arches when that was > > going on, but I have readded it a while back. (So noarch builds could > > also happen on s390x). Also, changes in koji 1.35 meant that srpm build > > tasks just use noarch_arches, so they too can happen on s390x. I've been > > watching things and so far this doesn't seem to be a problem. > > I was recently bitten by “fedpkg srpm” (or “fedpkg build --scratch > --srpm”) not yet using --arch noarch for constructing the source RPM. 8-/ I think the idea is that a src.rpm should be the same constructed on any arch... ie, https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_no_arch_specific_sources_or_patches > > > Also, longer term for ppc64le I have put in for budget next year to add > > memory/faster disks and there is also possibly power10 on the horizon, > > which I hope will be faster/biggger. > > Historically, Red Hat's POWER systems used desktop-class disks and had > very poor I/O as a result. Builds can be quite I/O heavy, and > minute-long hangs during initial package installation were not uncommon. > These systems are supposed to be use with a SAN, but I don't think we > have that. Yeah, thats another option, we do sort of have. I would have to try and find space for it and time to setup a iscsi volume and see if it helps any. The local ssd/nvme is a lot cheaper/less interdependent though. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
