On Mon, Oct 21 2024 at 02:51:56 PM +02:00:00, Lennart Poettering
<mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I know you don't like systemd-resolved, but maybe you can at least
acknowledge that is does exist.
The nice thing about IPC APIs is it's easy to reimplement them however
you please, similar to how elogind reimplements many systemd D-Bus
APIs. It might make more sense to stick with the systemd-resolved
varlink and D-Bus APIs that already exist, rather than create yet
another competing standard.
We even have some non-DNS precedent for this. When systemd-timedated
removed support for NTP services other than systemd-timesyncd, Fedora
replaced systemd-timedated with timedatex and maintained timedatex for
several years. Then when systemd-timedated backtracked on that
decision, we switched back. Applications never noticed because the API
was the same the whole time.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
