Do you see any problems if glibc starts using /usr/etc/services if /etc/services does not exist? Same for /usr/etc/protocols, /usr/etc/rpc and so on. It's already used on openSUSE, apparently. And alternative proposal was to use /usr/share/services (which I really dislike), or /usr/share/nss/services (to which I do not have any objections). Background: [PATCH] nss: look for databases in /usr/share/ if they don't exist in /etc/ <https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/ZvZj2jkpJjhaP-Yc@gardel-login/> Tracking upstream projects that do not support hermetic-usr for configuration <https://github.com/uapi-group/specifications/issues/76> Thanks, Florian -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
