Re: Something wrong with rawhide (41) keys?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 09:49:55 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 20:48 -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> > > Hi Kevin,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 2024 11:01:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 07:03:05AM GMT, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> > > > > As of right now (09/05/2024, 7:00am EDT), I'm getting an error when
> > > > > running `mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --clean --init` on an
> > > > > up-to-date f40 machine:
> > > > > 
> > > > > ...
> > > > 
> > > > You need to update to the latest mock-core-configs and
> > > > distribution-gpg-keys packages, then do a 'mock --scrub=all'.
> > > 
> > > My mock-core-configs (well, all mock-* packages) and distribution-gpg-keys
> > > are all up to date (on f40). I removed /var/lib/mock/* AND ran
> > > `mock --scrub=all`, and still keep getting the same `transaction
> > > failed: Signature verification failed.` error as before when I attempt
> > > to build anything for `mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 foo.src.rpm`
> > > 
> > > > Basically we have branched f41 from rawhide, and rawhide is now moving
> > > > toward f42. So it's signed by a different key, but your mock/keys thinks
> > > > it's still f41 and may have old f41 cached packages it's trying to use?
> > > 
> > > I figured that's what must have happened, but from where I'm sitting
> > > there are some lingering remaining side-effects that seem out of my
> > > control :) Any further ideas as to what might be happening much
> > > appreciated!
> > 
> > When I ran into stuff like this around the dnf5 and container
> > transition, I just wiped every dir under /var/lib/mock and
> > /var/cache/mock , and it seemed to clear it up.
> 
> Yeah, I am not sure what else it could be... unless you have locally
> modified the config anywhere?
> 
> Does a 'rpm -V mock-core-configs' show any changes in the rawhide
> template?

Nope, running that returns no output. Any chance the f40
mock-core-configs are still testing, or somehow behind the ones on f41
or whatever everyone else who is *not* running into my issue is using? :D

Since this is turning out not to be obvious, maybe it would be better
done as a bugzilla ticket; I'll file one later tonight when I'm back in my regular work environment...

Thanks,
--Gabriel
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux