Re: Encouraging the use of multiple packaging systems on one systems, and the resulting problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 14:30 +1000, Mike MacCana wrote:
> 
> On Linux, most administrators install software by RPM, and no
> distinction is made between 'third party' or distro provided except the
> Packager field.

Actually it makes a huge difference.  Where are updates going to come
from?  What other deps will I have to install to get this rpm in?  What
core software might be replaced by these deps that I have to watch out
for?  What is the likelihood that this software will be maintained in
the future when security or bug reports are made?  What happens when we
upgrade OS releases, etc. etc..  Admins care greatly where their
software comes from.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key
(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux