Re: Encouraging the use of multiple packaging systems on one systems, and the resulting problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike MacCana wrote:

On Linux, most administrators install software by RPM, and no
distinction is made between 'third party' or distro provided except the
Packager field.

Agreed, but RPM-installed software does not usually end up in
/usr/local. If I remember the FHS correctly, it is not supposed to end
up there, as /usr/local is reserved to locally installed software and
must be left untouched by a system upgrade. The typical Linux distro
muddles the concept of what is a "system upgrade", e.g. is OpenOffice
part of the system upgrade, but I had always regarded the wording in the
FHS as a guarantee that "there should not be surprises in /usr/local".
Am I wrong ?

Thank you for your consideration,
Davide Bolcioni

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux