Re: Flaws detected by static analyzers in Fedora 41 Critical Path Packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 2:28 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 01:37:20PM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > I request somebody from the tools team to comment on these concerns. We only
> > report the defects identified by gcc, clang etc.
>
> You wrote:
>
>   > TLDR: This report[2] contains 73976 identified defects.
>
> and again above said they were "defects".  Well, we know the ones in
> libvirt & QEMU are nearly all NOT defects, so don't use that word.
>

I have opened a GitHub issue[1] to follow up on this suggestion. Thanks!

[1] https://github.com/csutils/csdiff/issues/193

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux