Cristian Le wrote: > > My opinion is that whatcanidoforfedora is nice visually and easy to > navigate being just a few big font words and buttons, useful for people > like me with short attention span to read small text. It gives a more > general overview of what composes the Fedora ecosystem, rather than > having the first step to be to create an account (no objection on having > a link to WelcomeToFedora as the next steps there though). See, your "easy" to navigate is my "tedious" to navigate. I'm all for concise text and big fonts/buttons, but the whole eye-exam / one-at-a-time thumbs up/down presentation just feels like the height of wasting-my-time to slog through. > I would prefer to just have the references updated. Not intuitive to > find where they are defined, but I believe it's just: > https://github.com/fedora-infra/asknot-ng/blob/b456a821873828bc02e7f804d46ba... But personal opinions aside (as they will surely vary), it's not a matter of just updating the site once. Unless someone's going to commit to KEEPING it updated, it'll be out of date again within a year. And having it sequestered off on a totally different site may enable it to live at that cool-if-it-was-2006 dedicated application URL, but it also sequesters the content and massively reduces the likelihood that it'll be kept current. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
