V Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:45:53AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > I guess the test does not take RPM Conflicts into account. It's overly > > optimistic when populating a system by installing all tested packages together > > instead of creating a new system for each test seperately. Or by adding > > --allowerasing to "dnf install" invocations if the CI wants to reuse > > the system. > > Yes and no. The test does not look at the package metadata at all, it just > tries to install all the packages that were part of the update. > In the case above, coreutils.srpm builds coreutils.rpm and coreutils-single.srpm, > which have Conflicts on one another, and cannot be installed at the same time. > > The test which (I think) we really want is to install the combined set > of packages from the update, so we exercise the situation that will occur > on end-user systems, but exclude the packages from this set which are known > to be not co-installable. > Maybe I conflate installability tests with rpmdeplint tests. We need both: A test which checks that each package is separately installable. And a test which tcgecks that wanted combinations of packages can be installed together. I cannot see how "exclude the packages from this set which are known to be not co-installable" can be achieved automatically. Either the test will examine package metadata for Conflicts to exclude the conflicting packages, or someone will have to maintain the good set of combinanations. > If there's one "CI person", then that is AdamW. He's doing great work > (also in the update I linked in my original post). IIUC, AdamW's focus > is on the 'update.*' tests, and those are fine, they generally pass. > The bodhi results page says: > > For help debugging failed Fedora CI tests (fedora-ci.*), contact the Fedora CI team. > For help debugging failed Fedora CoreOS tests (coreos.*), contact the Fedora CoreOS team. > For help debugging failed openQA tests (update.*), contact the Fedora Quality team, ... > > I added ci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in CC. > I thought fedora-ci.* tests which we talk about. A person in that case is Michal Srb who already responded in this thread. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
