Le vendredi 21 octobre 2005 à 18:34 +0200, Davide Bolcioni a écrit : > In my opinion, the problem of third-party (meaning not provided by > the distribution) applications is supposed to be solved by /opt, but > the suppport for /opt across distributions is arguably even less > developed than for /usr/local. So maybe the real answer is "provide > support for /usr/local and /opt integration". No one disagrees on this. What people disagree on are bits like "Encouraging the use of multiple packaging systems" and all the marketing handwaving that's been advanced to justify it. /usr/local and /opt will be supported to provide a dumping ground for the quick hacks people need to do now and then. Not because generalising these hacks is a good idea, and certainly not because it will make them "first class citizens". If the requirement to use a single packaging system was obvious fluff as we're asked to believe you'd have several major distributions using multiple packaging systems on the market today. Certainly the Linux market is "fragmented" enough for people to prove the ideas they believe in. And now I'll shut up. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
