On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 03:36 +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > Michael A. Peters wrote: > > >> * Actually I'm not even sure regular $PATH includes /usr/local/bin, but > >> maybe that was some other distro ... > > > > /usr/local/bin is in my path - if a distro does not include it, it is > > imho a bug. > > It's there, but it comes after /bin and /usr/bin, making it > useless for people who install replacement versions of vendor > packages. Its quite useful for people who install replacements to vendors packages. They just have to do it properly. Using the same packaging system as everyone else. It makes it inconvenient for people who try and install multiple copies of the same software to different directories using different packaging systems. These people are likely inconveniencing themselves in many other ways. Mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
