On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 03:36 +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > Michael A. Peters wrote: > > >> * Actually I'm not even sure regular $PATH includes /usr/local/bin, but > >> maybe that was some other distro ... > > > > /usr/local/bin is in my path - if a distro does not include it, it is > > imho a bug. > > It's there, but it comes after /bin and /usr/bin, making it > useless for people who install replacement versions of vendor > packages. It should come after /bin and /usr/bin - system installed administration scripts may expect behavior specific to the version installed with the system. A user can re-arrange the path if they need to - or create an alias if they need to (probably better). -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
