Re: Following up on: Three steps we could take to make supply chain attacks a bit harder

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-06-25 10:37 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I wonder if this wouldn't fit in as a CI test?


Do you mean https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/generic_tests/ ?

Maybe it would?  If I misunderstand this, please correct me:

Because Fedora uses "-z,relro" and "-z,now" in %build_ldflags, all binaries should have a fully resolved GOT when they reach main().  That being the case, gdb could be started with any binary, at which point it could set a breakpoint at "main", run the binary, and then audit the GOT at the breakpoint.

Does that sound right?


Or something that might be added to rpminspect?


It's been a few months since I looked at rpminspect.  Does it install a package and all of its deps in order to inspect it?  The GOT can't be audited unless the process can start.


--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux