* Miroslav Suchý: > Dne 25. 06. 24 v 1:09 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a): >> >> Could you make the comment something like this? >> >> # Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2 >> # TODO check if there are other licenses to be listed >> License: GPL-2.0-only > > We (the Change owners) discussed this on a meeting today. And we agreed on output: > > # Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2 > # TODO convert to correct SPDX identifier > # See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/ > License: LicenseRef-Callaway-GPLv2 > > This is valid SPDX identifier. But not on the list of Fedora's allowed > licenses, so any QA tool will remind you to check the license. > > What do you think? Could you add an HTML anchor with GPLv2 specific information? Otherwise it looks a bit silly to anyone who isn't familiar with the GPLv2 ambiguity, and will likely result in unchecked replacement with GPL-2.0-only in many cases. Thanks, Florian -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
