Re: Reverse dependency query

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 3:01 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It looks like the problem is actually on the sympy side, not with your query.
>
> The latest "sympy.src" package does not have a dependency on antlr4:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=38863151

So ...`%ifarch %{java_arches}` evaluated to false when the source RPM
was generated?  Does that mean that other BuildRequires inside of
%ifarch might be hidden from such queries?  That would make the
queries less useful than I would like.

$ fedrq wr javapackages-tools | grep -F brlapi
$

No results, when brlapi-java should have been listed.  So I can't rely
on fedrq or repoquery to give me a full list of reverse dependencies
when I check for impact of a version upgrade.  That's really, really
unfortunate.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux