java-*-openjdk-portable and the FTBFS policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

I am about to send a reminder about Rawhide packages that were not successfully built on a supported Fedora release / fail top build for 2+ releases.

Amongst the list of the packages, I see:

    java-1.8.0-openjdk-portable-1:1.8.0.412.b06-1.fc38.src
    java-11-openjdk-portable-1:11.0.23.0.9-1.fc38.src
    java-17-openjdk-portable-1:17.0.11.0.9-1.fc38.src
    java-21-openjdk-portable-1:21.0.3.0.9-1.fc38.src
    java-latest-openjdk-portable-1:22.0.1.0.8-1.rolling.fc38.src

Technically, those packages do not fail to build, but they were built on Fedora 38 on purpose. However, Fedora 38 is now EOL so the package do violate the "built on supported release" principle of the policy.

Should those packages be exempted from the policy, or should we rebuild them on Fedora 39 now? I don't know if this poses some additional expenses wrt certification.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Fedora Matrix: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux