> Am 10.06.2024 um 20:16 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> I wish this proposal included some examples of what might get broken >> and what will keep working. I guess I am not the only one who have >> very vague understanding what is difference between "signatures" and >> "hashing" or other purposes SHA1 can be used for. > > SSH and HTTPS to old machines (even old versions of Fedora & RHEL) and > to old network equipment and the like will not be possible. > > I'm annoyed that this is not just put behind the LEGACY policy, since > if that's not what "legacy" is for, what _is_ it for? > > As an aside, it'd be very nice if policies could be set per-process. > That would greatly enhance security by allowing specific programs to > connect to the legacy machines, while maintaining general system > security. > > Anyway, -1 from me. > > Rich. Anyway, -1 from me, too For exactly that reason. -- Peter Boy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy PBoy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2) Fedora Server Edition Working Group member Fedora Docs team contributor and board member Java developer and enthusiast -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
