Re: Intention to unretire and rename pyftpdlib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 2:48 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
<devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Sandro wrote:
> > I was probably overthinking this. In practice it will turn out to be a
> > new package submission indeed. Moreover, the last remaining active
> > branch of the retired package (F38) is now EOL.
> >
> > I've submitted the review [1] without any Obsoletes.
>
> Since we support upgrades from Fedora n to n+2, there SHOULD be Obsoletes in
> place until at least the F40 EOL. I would recommend just keeping the
> Obsoletes forever.

Why? The only thing that is being renamed as part of the unretirement
is the *source* package.
Obsoletes and Provides have zero effect for those. So not adding them
is correct here.

Fabio
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux