On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 4:24 PM Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:47 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 9:43 PM Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Do you think that's worth a separate Change from the Node.js 22 Change > > > I already filed? I can amend that (and ask FESCo to re-vote based on > > > new information). > > > > I think the change is significant enough, yes. > > Having a separate change would lead to more visibility, but I think > > just amending the existing Change and having FESCo re-approve would be > > fine too. > > > > Looks like we can avoid this question for a bit longer. Node.js 22.2.0 > appears to have fixed the incompatibility with i686 builds. Phew. Even better! Thank you for looking into it. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
