On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 19:05 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:49:27AM -0600, Stephen J. Smoogen wrote: > > One of the things we have to do at our sites is remove the Red > > Hat/Fedora syslog services and replace them with syslog-ng. The TCP > > part, the better message congestion issues, and the better ability to > > group logging together is really needed by larger sites. [We have > > found that the lossiness of regular syslog can get black marks on > > reviews.] A long time ago, it was proposed for inclusion around Red > > Hat Linux 6.0 but was considered too unstable and some other issues. > > > > Could it be evaluated again for either for replacing the older syslog > > system or working the syslog system so that alternatives could cover > > it with syslog-ng in extras? What issues would need to be done to help > > this along? > > Hello Stephen, > > syslog-ng has shown up in Fedora Extras, so testing out that package > does certainly help. Given the long history of the current syslog > package, I am not sure if/when a good point for that will come. > I think no time like the present. It's not like we have to maintain syslog compat b/t fc4 and fc5. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
