Re: Your Fedora requests for aws-checksums, aws-c-compression, aws-lc and s2n-tls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/05/2024 02.21, Dominik Wombacher wrote:
> 
> Hi Benson,
> 
>>
>> Happy to co-maintain. Feel free to close my requests if you want to
>> proceed soon, would not be able to update them till late next week.
>>
> 
> thanks a lot, for both. I submitted new requests today:

Ok. cc-ing list as open discussion of development is encouraged.

> 
> Packaging order based on dependencies between AWS C libs:
> 
> 1. aws-c-common [1][2]
> 2. aws-c-cal [3], aws-c-sdkutils [4], aws-c-compression [5], aws-checksums [6]
> 3. s2n-tls [7], aws-c-io [8]
> 4. aws-c-http [9], aws-c-event-stream [10]
> 5. aws-c-auth [11], aws-c-mqtt [12]
> 6. aws-c-s3 [13]
> 
>>
>> When I last checked, the standard OpenSSL libs were not well supported.
>> If they can be used instead, that is fine.
>>
> 
> I think that changed. Upstream doesn't mention a limitation and I was able to build against OpenSSL. s2n-tls is used as wrapper by some AWS C libs. So I submitted a new request for it too. But build it also with OpenSSL and shared libraries.
> 
>>>
>>> aws-lc
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223664
>>>
> 
> That one is still in my backlog and not submitted yet. I have to check if a package really needs it. So far it looks like that s2n-tls is fine when using OpenSSL.
> 
> 
> Dom
> 
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240798
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246663
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049400
> [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2279003
> [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2279006
> [6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2279007
> [7] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2279008
> [8] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2279009
> [9] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2279010
> [10] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2279011
> [11] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2279012
> [12] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2279013
> [13] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2279014
> 
> 
> --
> The Wombelix Post
> https://dominik.wombacher.cc
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux