Re: LLVM Packaging Ideas for Fedora 41

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> You also have to do new package
> reviews for each new version instead of using the compatibility
> package exception to branch older releases into compatibility
> packages.

I don't think this will be needed because it is one of the exceptions [1]:

    The package is being created so that multiple versions of the same
    package can coexist in the distribution (or coexist between EPEL and
    RHEL). The package MUST be properly named according to the naming
    guidelines and MUST NOT conflict with all other versions of the same
    package. 

AFAIU, this proposal is following all the requirements mentioned in this
exception.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_process

-- 
Tulio Magno
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux