Re: Is there a policy for branches being merged or not

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 11:35 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 10:27:26AM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> > I know this is just a cosmetic issue, but choices made by the
> > primary maintainers should be respected IMO.
>
> I agree in general, but sometimes if you're making mechanical changes
> across 100s of packages it's hard to do this in practice.

I make sure to read the (bulk) change proposals
and if I care about how they may impact my
packages I will try to perform the changes in
advance (so any mechanical changes find
nothing to do).  Choosing to let the automation
do whatever it is going to do is still a choice.
I attempt to choose wisely.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux