On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:12 PM Michel Lind <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I've been maintaining bamf for... quite some time, and don't actually have a > need for it anymore. > > It's pretty much in maintenance mode upstream as well. > > I've built the last stable version in Rawhide to close > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055853 > > but will probably not build for stable releases, I'll let the new maintainer(s) > handle that. > > Right now it looks like only plank actually uses it; its maintainer is cc:ed > > $ fedrq whatrequires bamf > bamf-daemon-0.5.5-8.fc40.x86_64 > bamf-devel-0.5.5-8.fc40.i686 > bamf-devel-0.5.5-8.fc40.x86_64 > plank-libs-0.11.89-15.20210202.git013d051.fc40.i686 > plank-libs-0.11.89-15.20210202.git013d051.fc40.x86_64 > > So if you use plank, or otherwise have a need for this, feel free to take this over. The story with plank is a bit weird ... The last release was in 2019, and elementary OS forked it some years later, because upstream development was pretty much dead. At that point, I was a (co-)maintainer of the plank package, and switched the package to build from the elementary fork, because it had fixes and support for some new stuff. However, elementary has been developing their own dock from scratch (with eyes on eventual Wayland support), and the plank project on launchpad actually looks more active again :| So maybe the package should be switched back to the original upstream when / if the new elementary Dock is ready (it's not yet) ... Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
