Hello Rich, > There's also the issue that liblzma is widely used and offers specific > features which zstd does not[1]. > > [1] https://github.com/facebook/zstd/issues/395#issuecomment-535875379 Is that about this? https://github.com/facebook/zstd/tree/dev/contrib/seekable_format >From a Distro decision viewpoint does an alternative like ZSTD have to solve all the problems XZ does to be considered? Even if it solves a bunch of other problems? Like the 'many eyes' one? My old manager was always quoting about "Analysis Paralysis" and "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good". I'm no expert on this for sure but it seems that changing what CAN be changed has some value. And dealing with the rest when you can. So I'm just curious what "Good enough" looks like to act on something for Fedora ? Cheers! Arnie -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
