Re: Three steps we could take to make supply chain attacks a bit harder

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:38:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:55 PM Steve Cossette <farchord@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I personally would very much agree with enforcing the use of 2fa on the Fedora Account System. Maybe take that opportunity to make it a bit more user friendly? (Such as the fkinit prompt requiring the 2fa code being added at the end of your password -- to be clear I think the 2fa code should be separate)
> 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-packager/pull-request/179

I agree that fixing the mismatch in prompts might be nice, but why does
having 2fa seperate make things any better? I mean, it's one more return
you get to hit. ;)

And... I am not sure about moving the handling of passwords to a bash
script from a kinit prompt.

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux