On Sat, Mar 30 2024 at 12:26:48 PM +00:00:00, Christopher Klooz
<py0xc3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If I got Rich right, the malicious code is likely to be broken on
F40,
No, that is not correct, as explained by [1] and [2]. We have already
asked Red Hat to investigate and fix the blog post. This is still an
evolving situation; apologies for the confusion as we sort this out.
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/BAO5S2VGTTWD6MHHCFHTAIAHZQFMOGAQ/
[2]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/BAO5S2VGTTWD6MHHCFHTAIAHZQFMOGAQ/
Then we must have had some communication snafu regarding the Fedora
Magazine article, because multiple people including myself flagged the
incorrect statement there before the article was published. Hopefully
we can get one this fixed, too.
Michael
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
