Re: Feedback wanted: Kvantum 1.1.0 spec changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 10:33 AM Arthur Bols <arthur@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 28/03/2024 12:22, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 6:11 AM Arthur Bols <arthur@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This seems reasonable to me. Do we have any packaged themes that need
> > to be adjusted alongside it?
> Thanks for taking a look!
>
> I don't think so. There is nothing breaking in the changelog for themes
> and everything still works fine on my systems. Themes should require the
> kvantum package and put their files in /usr/share/Kvantum, so
> packaging-wise everything stays the same.
>

Then I say let's do it. :)



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux