On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 1:28 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 2:24 PM Scott Williams <vwfoxguru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > If we have some clue that a v7 merge/release
> > is on the very near horizon for KeyDB
>
> This doesn't look promising for v7 in time for Fedora 40 or shortly after, unfortunately: https://github.com/Snapchat/KeyDB/issues/420
>
> The choice of shipping an ever-stale v7 database versus a maintainable v6 one is not a fun one, but leaving it up to Fedora package maintainers to have to potentially come up with their own out-of-band patches for CVEs for redis-7 seems like the worse choice to me.
I think the immediate fix is pulling in redict once it makes its first
release: https://codeberg.org/redict/redict
I very much think we should take a wait and see approach for now. KeyDB, while slow, has at least published something. redict is totally unknown. Maybe it gets a huge following, maybe it doesn't.
We don't have to make any rash decisions since the current versions of redis are in good shape for the time being.
-- Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
