Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anything that was new in Redis 7 is not currently in KeyDB.  This is a decent list of features I found that would be impacted.

https://www.instaclustr.com/blog/redis-7-new-features/

KeyDB has it on their roadmap to merge in the latest features from Redis 7 but that's not complete yet (nor can I find any published status on that).  EPEL doesn't currently provide Redis for 8/9 because it got pulled in directly by RH.  RHEL 9 does have a module for redis 7 but the default is 6, so that's easy at least.  There should be no problems with adding KeyDB to EPEL 8/9 - in fact it doesn't even conflict with redis (though keydb-devel will conflict with redis-devel as keydb-devel still uses identical names of some libraries it produces).

Honestly trying to replace redis with KeyDB in Fedora would be a step backwards and cause headaches so I don't think it's feasible, at least until redis v7 features are merged into KeyDB.

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 1:05 PM Scott Williams <vwfoxguru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Assuming KeyDB gets accepted (it looks close from the Bugzilla review), we should obsolete redis for KeyDB in Fedora 40+ and consider eventually doing likewise with EPEL as well, since we aren't going to be able to ship any redis patches moving forward.  I feel less strongly about that for EPEL as for Fedora.  As a Fedora redis user, personally, having KeyDB in-place replace redis on upgrade to Fedora 40 seems like the best possible route moving forward to limit end-user disruption and technical debt for Fedora.

As long as KeyDB's multi-threading isn't enabled out of box, it should essentially be equivalent to redis-6 as I understand it.  We're currently shipping redis-7.2.4 in Fedora 39.  Are there any potential redis-7 specific compatibility problems with KeyDB migration? 
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux